Skip to main content
Sturdly
Federal ADA website filing

Kim v. Shoe Palace Corporation

Filed 2023-12-27District N.D. Cal.Case number 3:23-cv-06632Industry Retail & E-commerce

Parties

Defendant
Shoe Palace Corporation
Plaintiff
Kim

Filing facts

Court
N.D. Cal.
State
California
Case number
3:23-cv-06632
Date filed
2023-12-27
Nature of suit
446 (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Category
ada website
Data source
court_listener
Industry
Retail & E-commerce

Why this case appears here

This is a real federal court filing pulled from CourtListener’s public RECAP archive. It was identified as an ADA website-accessibility case based on its Nature of Suit code (446, 443, or 440) and the case caption. We don’t add commentary on the merits — the filing speaks for itself.

If the case looks like a template for the demand letter you received, you are not alone. The same five WCAG criteria show up in roughly 80% of these complaints: alt text, color contrast, keyboard navigation, link purpose, and name/role/value. See the main litigation tracker for the patterns.

Sources & dockets

  • Synthetic case ID: cl-cand-3:23-cv-06632
Worried about your own site?

Run the same axe-core engine plaintiff firms use. Free, no signup, results in about 60 seconds.

Free accessibility scan →Got a demand letter?
Recent retail & e-commerce filings in California